Prostate adenocarcinoma: Difference between revisions
→Microscopic evaluation: Gallery format |
→Characteristics: Specified |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
File:Micrograph of prostate adenocarcinoma with a glomeruloid gland.jpg|Glomerulation. | File:Micrograph of prostate adenocarcinoma with a glomeruloid gland.jpg|Glomerulation. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
*Perineural invasion.<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> It should be circumferential to count.<ref name=Stanford>{{cite web|url=http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/prostate/adenocarcinoma/|title=Prostatic Adenocarcinoma|website=Stanford Medical School|author=Robert V Rouse MD}} Last update 2/2/16</ref><ref group="notes>Glands adjacent to and indenting nerves is not sufficient as a diagnostic criterion by itself. Glands partially surrounding a nerve is an indication of carcinoma. (Stanford)</ref> | *'''Perineural''' invasion.<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> It should be circumferential to count.<ref name=Stanford>{{cite web|url=http://surgpathcriteria.stanford.edu/prostate/adenocarcinoma/|title=Prostatic Adenocarcinoma|website=Stanford Medical School|author=Robert V Rouse MD}} Last update 2/2/16</ref><ref group="notes>Glands adjacent to and indenting nerves is not sufficient as a diagnostic criterion by itself. Glands partially surrounding a nerve is an indication of carcinoma. (Stanford)</ref> | ||
*Angiolymphatic invasion<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> | *'''Angiolymphatic''' invasion<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> | ||
*Extraprostatic extension <ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> | *'''Extraprostatic''' extension,<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> which in biopsies can be diagnoses when tumor cells are located in fatty tissue. | ||
;Relatively common and highly specific:<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> | ;Relatively common and highly specific:<ref name="CruzSantana2016"/> | ||
<gallery mode=packed heights=180> | <gallery mode=packed heights=180> | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 14 September 2020
Authors:
Mikael Häggström; Authors of integrated Creative Commons article[1] [note 1]
Gross processing
As prostatectomy or biopsy.
Microscopic evaluation
Screening method
- Before microscopy, look at each microscopy slide by eye, to plan the microscopy screening so as to not miss peripheral fragments.
- Screen at low power, and switch to high power when encountering glandular structures that can not otherwise be cleared. Look in particular for those surrounding nerves.
- At least if no cancer is seen, also look for inflammation.[notes 1]
Characteristics of adenocarcinoma
- Relatively common and highly specific findings of prostatic adenocarcinoma
- [1]
-
Multiple nucleoli (Pictured in an acinar adenocarcinoma, the most common subdiagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma)
-
Eccentric nucleoli[1] (pictured example has double and eccentric nucleoli).
- Specific but relatively rare signs of adenocarcinoma
- [notes 2]
On biopsies, look in particular near the tips for perineural invasion, as it is most likely seen by the capsule. Glands adjacent to and indenting nerves is not sufficient as a diagnostic criterion by itself. Glands partially surrounding a nerve is an indication of carcinoma.[2]
- Collagenous micronodules for acinar adenocarcinoma[1]
- Angiolymphatic invasion[1]
- Extraprostatic extension,[1] which in biopsies can be diagnosed when tumor cells are located in fatty tissue.
- Less specific findings
-
Mitoses: also seen in for example high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostate inflammation.[1] Picture shows adenocarcinoma with two mitoses in reactive epithelium.
-
Intraluminal blue mucin[1] (pictured in acinar adenocarcinoma)
-
Intraluminal atypical eosinophilic secretions.[1]
-
Intraluminal crystalloids.[3]
-
Uneven distribution and infiltrative pattern of glands
-
Glomerulations, for acinar adenocarcinoma, consisting of epithelial proliferations into one or more gland lumina, typically a cribriform tuft with a single attachment to the gland wall.[2]
- Prominent nucleoli[1]
- Nuclear enlargement
Precancerous lesions
In case of only less specific findings, consider a Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) or an atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP).
A PIN is where acini are architecturally benign, but individual cells display atypia. In high-grade PIN (HGPIN), the changes are similar to those of prostate cancer, whereas in low-grade (LGPIN) the changes are milder. Most pathologists do not report the presence of LGPIN.[5]
An ASAP is a lesion that is probably carcinoma but either lacks definitive diagnostic features, or is too small to be certain (see image below).[6] It should not be used for benign lesions that are just unusual looking.[6] In uncertain cases, a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma can be excluded by immunohistochemical detection of basal cells (or confirmed by absence thereof),[1] such as using the PIN-4 cocktail of stains (which consists of P504S, p63 and high-molecular-weight keratins (HMWK) such as CK5 and CK14).
-
Small acinar cell proliferation, with acinar cells with large nuclei, prominent nucleoli (arrows marking two of them) and no certain basal cell lining.
-
PIN-4 staining of benign prostate gland and adenocarcinoma
Picture above compares a PIN-4 immunohistochemistry of benign gland (left) and adenocarcinoma (right) using PIN-4. The adenocarcinoma lacks the basal epithelial cells (stained dark brown by p63 and HMWK). Also, in PIN-4 stained samples, adenocarcinoma cells generally display red cytoplasms (stained by AMACR, also known as P504S), while benign glands do not.
-
Atrophy is a differential diagnosis to prostate cancer. This example shows gradually increasing simple atrophy from left to right, H&E stain. Crowding and angulation may mimic that of adenocarcinoma, but there is nuclear basophilia rather than atypia, and occasional basal cells can still be seen.
-
Also, seminal vesicle glands may mimic prostatic adenocarcinoma by crowded glands with enlarged hyperchromatic and irregular nuclei, but will have inconspicuous nucleoli and coarse refractile golden brown lipofuscin granules.[7]
Characteristics
- Specific but relatively rare signs of adenocarcinoma
- [notes 3]
- Collagenous micronodules for acinar adenocarcinoma (the most common subdiagnosis)[1]
- Glomerulations, for acinar adenocarcinoma,[1] consisting of epithelial proliferations into one or more gland lumina, typically a cribriform tuft with a single attachment to the gland wall.[8]
-
Glomerulation.
- Perineural invasion.[1] It should be circumferential to count.[8][notes 4]
- Angiolymphatic invasion[1]
- Extraprostatic extension,[1] which in biopsies can be diagnoses when tumor cells are located in fatty tissue.
- Relatively common and highly specific
- [1]
-
multiple nucleoli (Pictured in an acinar adenocarcinoma)
-
Eccentric nucleoli[1] (pictured example has double and eccentric nucleoli).
- Less specific findings
-
Mitoses: also seen in for example high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostate inflammation.[1] Picture shows adenocarcinoma with two mitoses in reactive epithelium.
-
Intraluminal blue mucin[1] (pictured in acinar adenocarcinoma)
-
Intraluminal atypical eosinophilic secretions.[1]
-
Uneven distribution and infiltrative pattern of glands
- Prominent nucleoli[1]
- Nuclear enlargement
In uncertain cases, a diagnosis of malignancy can be discarded by immunohistochemical detection of basal cells,[1] using the PIN-4 cocktail of stains.[notes 5]
Subdiagnoses
The histopathologic subdiagnosis of prostate cancer has implications for the possibility and methodology of any subsequent Gleason scoring.[9] The most common histopathological subdiagnosis of prostate cancer is acinar adenocarcinoma, constituting 93% of prostate cancers.[10] The most common form of acinar adenocarcinoma, in turn, is "adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified", also termed conventional, or usual acinar.[11]
| Subdiagnosis | Relative incidence | Image | Microscopic characteristics | Immunohistochemistry | Gleason scoring | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core biopsy |
Radical prostatectomy | ||||||
| Acinar adenocarcinoma - 93%[10] |
Adenocarcinoma (not otherwise specified/ conventional/ usual acinar)[11] |
77%[notes 7] | 54%[notes 7] | File:Micrograph of prostate cancer with Gleason score 8 (4+4) with glomeruloid glands.jpg | Tumorous glands: | As usual | |
| Foamy gland carcinoma | 17%[12][notes 6] | 13–23%[12][notes 6] | Based on architecture, discounting foamy cytoplasms[9] | ||||
| Atrophic carcinoma | 2%[12][notes 8] | 16%[12][notes 8] | Tumorous glands: | As usual[9] | |||
| Pseudohyperplastic carcinoma | 2%[12] | 11%[12] |
|
Tumorous glands: | 3+3=6[9] | ||
| Microcystic carcinoma | 11%[12] | On (usually) adjacent acinar adeocarcinoma[13] | |||||
| PIN-like | 1.3%[14] |
|
Tumorous glands:
|
Not recommended[9] | |||
| Non acinar (or mixed acinar/ non-acinar) adenocarcinoma |
Ductal adenocarcinoma | 3% to 12.7%[15][notes 6] | File:Micrograph of typical ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.jpg | ||||
| Intraductal adenocarcinoma | 2.8%[17] | File:Micrograph of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate with an infiltrative growth pattern.jpg H&E and CK5/6 |
|||||
| Urothelial carcinoma | 0.7 to 2.8%[19] | File:Urothelial carcinoma in the prostatic urethra, low mag.jpg | Not recommended[9] | ||||
| Small-cell carcinoma | 0.3–2%[21][22][notes 6] | File:Micrograph of small-cell carcinoma of the prostate.jpg |
Half of cases have usual acinar components[9] |
||||
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 0.2%[19] | File:Micrograph of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 7 (3 + 4) with individual well-formed glands and minor component of cribriform glands floating in extracellular mucin.jpg |
|
Tumorous glands: | 4+4=8 for irregular cribriform glands floating in mucin.[9] | ||
| Signet-ring adenocarcinoma | 0.02%[23] | File:Micrograph of signet-ring adenocarcinoma of the prostate.jpg |
|
Tumorous glands: | Not recommended[9] | ||
| Basal-cell carcinoma | 0.01%[24] | Basaloid tumor:
BCC-pattern: |
Not recommended.[9] | ||||
Gleason scoring
Rate the dominant, or most common cell morphology (scored 1—5), in addition to the non-dominant cell pattern with the highest grade (scored 1—5).
-
Gleason pattern 6 (3+3).jpg
-
Gleason pattern 7 (3+4).jpg
-
Gleason pattern 8 (4+4).jpg
-
Gleason pattern 9 (4+5).jpg
-
Gleason pattern 10 (5+5).jpg
-
Gleason score 6 (3+3)
-
Cribriform pattern: Gleason grade 4
-
Gleason score 7 (3+4) with minor component of cribriform glands
-
Gleason score 8 (4+4) with glomeruloid glands
-
Gleason score 8 (4+4) with irregular cribriform glands
-
Gleason score 8 (4+4) with fused glands with cytoplasmic vacuoles
-
Gleason score 8 (4+4) with poorly-formed glands
-
Gleason score 9 (4+5) with cribriform glands, some with necrosis
-
Gleason score 10 (5+5) with cords of cells
-
Gleason score 10 (5+5) with individual cells
-
Gleason score 10 (5+5) with solid sheets of cells
Staging
Depending on sample type:
- Multiple biopsy specimens: Adenocarcinoma presence in how many of the biopsies
- Prostatectomy: Stage by TNM:
From the AJCC 7th edition[25] and International Union Against Cancer (UICC) 7th edition.[26]
- Evaluation of the (primary) tumor ('T')
- TX: cannot evaluate the primary tumor
- T0: no evidence of tumor
- T1: tumor present, but not detectable clinically or with imaging
- T1a: tumor was incidentally found in 5% or less of prostate tissue resected (for other reasons)
- T1b: tumor was incidentally found in greater than 5% of prostate tissue resected
- T1c: tumor was found in a needle biopsy performed due to an elevated serum PSA
- T2: the tumor can be felt (palpated) on examination, but has not spread outside the prostate
- T2a: the tumor is in half or less than half of one of the prostate gland's two lobes
- T2b: the tumor is in more than half of one lobe, but not both
- T2c: the tumor is in both lobes but within the prostatic capsule
- T3: the tumor has spread through the prostatic capsule (if it is only part-way through, it is still T2)
- T3a: the tumor has spread through the capsule on one or both sides
- T3b: the tumor has invaded one or both seminal vesicles
- T4: the tumor has invaded other nearby structures
- Evaluation of the regional lymph nodes ('N')
- NX: cannot evaluate the regional lymph nodes
- N0: there has been no spread to the regional lymph nodes
- N1: there has been spread to the regional lymph nodes
- Evaluation of distant metastasis ('M')
- MX: cannot evaluate distant metastasis
- M0: there is no distant metastasis
- M1: there is distant metastasis
- M1a: the cancer has spread to lymph nodes beyond the regional ones
- M1b: the cancer has spread to bone
- M1c: the cancer has spread to other sites (regardless of bone involvement)
- Further information: Evaluation
Report
- Diagnosis
- Gleason score
- Extent
- Prostatectomy: Stage.
- Prostate biopsies: Number of biopsies where tumor is found.
- Any perineural or angiolymphatic invasion.
See also: General notes on reporting
Notes
- ↑ Inflammation can explain for example a high PSA value in the absence of adenocarcinoma, so its reporting is usually only needed in such cases.
- ↑ "Rare" here refers to prevalence at least in core biopsies.(Cruz 2016)
- ↑ "Rare" here refers to prevalence at least in core biopsies.(Cruz 2016)
- ↑ Glands adjacent to and indenting nerves is not sufficient as a diagnostic criterion by itself. Glands partially surrounding a nerve is an indication of carcinoma. (Stanford)
- ↑ PIN-4 consists of p504s, CK5, CK14 and p63.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 At least where noted, the numbers include cases where the pattern is found admixed with usual acinar adenocarcinoma.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Numbers for usual acinar adenocarcinoma do not include mixed patterns with other subdiagnoses.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Number refers to sporadic atrophic pattern adenocarcinoma.
- ↑ For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Patholines:Authorship for details.
Main page
References
- ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 Initially largely copied from: Cruz, Andrea O.; Santana, Amanda L. S.; Santos, Andréia C.; Athanazio, Daniel A. (2016). "Frequency of the morphological criteria of prostate adenocarcinoma in 387 consecutive prostate needle biopsies: emphasis on the location and number of nucleoli
". Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial. doi:. ISSN 1676-2444. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "CruzSantana2016" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Robert V Rouse MD. Prostatic Adenocarcinoma. Stanford Medical School. Last update 2/2/16
- ↑ Svatek, R S; Karam, J A; Rogers, T E; Shulman, M J; Margulis, V; Benaim, E A (2007). "Intraluminal crystalloids are highly associated with prostatic adenocarcinoma on concurrent biopsy specimens ". Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 10 (3): 279–282. doi:. ISSN 1365-7852.
- ↑ Image by Mikael Häggström, MD. Reference for features:
- Margaret Sanders, M.B.B.Ch., Murali Varma, M.B.B.S.. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Pathology Outlines. Last author update: 23 February 2021 - ↑ Stanley A Brosman, MD. Precancerous Lesions of the Prostate. Medscape. Updated: Feb 26, 2020
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 . Prostatic Adenocarcinoma - Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP). Stanford Medical School. Retrieved on 2020-09-14.
- ↑ Image by Mikael Häggström, MD. Reference for findings: Faryal Shoaib, M.D., Chinedum Okafor, M.D., Y. Albert Yeh, M.D., Ph.D.. Anatomy & histology-seminal vesicles / ejaculatory duct. Pathology Outlines. Last staff update: 20 November 2023
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Robert V Rouse MD. Prostatic Adenocarcinoma. Stanford Medical School. Last update 2/2/16
- ↑ 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 9.12 9.13 9.14 9.15 9.16 9.17 9.18 9.19 9.20 9.21 9.22 9.23 9.24 9.25 9.26 9.27 9.28 9.29 9.30 9.31 9.32 9.33 9.34 9.35 9.36 9.37 9.38 9.39 9.40 9.41 9.42 9.43 9.44 9.45 9.46 9.47 9.48 9.49 9.50 9.51 9.52 9.53 9.54 9.55 9.56 9.57 9.58 9.59 9.60 "The pathology of unusual subtypes of prostate cancer ". Chin. J. Cancer Res. 28 (1): 130–43. February 2016. doi:. PMID 27041935.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Baig, Faraz A.; Hamid, Amna; Mirza, Talat; Syed, Serajuddaula (2015). "Ductal and Acinar Adenocarcinoma of Prostate: Morphological and Immunohistochemical Characterization ". Oman Medical Journal 30 (3): 162–166. doi:. ISSN 1999768X.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 . Prostatic Adenocarcinoma. Stanford University School of Medicine. Retrieved on 2019-10-30.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 Humphrey, Peter A (2018). "Variants of acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate mimicking benign conditions ". Modern Pathology 31 (S1): 64–70. doi:. ISSN 0893-3952.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Yaskiv, Oksana; Cao, Dengfeng; Humphrey, Peter A. (2010). "Microcystic Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: A Variant of Pseudohyperplastic and Atrophic Patterns ". The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 34 (4): 556–561. doi:. ISSN 0147-5185.
- ↑ Zhou, Ming (2018). "High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, PIN-like carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate ". Modern Pathology 31 (S1): 71–79. doi:. ISSN 0893-3952.
- ↑ "The update of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma ". Chin. J. Cancer Res. 28 (1): 50–7. February 2016. doi:. PMID 27041926.
- ↑ Robert V Rouse (2012-01-06). Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Stanford University School of Medicine.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 Magers, Martin; Kunju, Lakshmi Priya; Wu, Angela (2015). "Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: Morphologic Features, Differential Diagnoses, Significance, and Reporting Practices ". Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 139 (10): 1234–1241. doi:. ISSN 0003-9985.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 Roberts, Jordan A.; Zhou, Ming; Park, Yong Wok; Ro, Jae Y. (2013). "Intraductal Carcinoma of Prostate: A Comprehensive and Concise Review ". Korean Journal of Pathology 47 (4): 307. doi:. ISSN 1738-1843.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Grignon, David J (2004). "Unusual subtypes of prostate cancer ". Modern Pathology 17 (3): 316–327. doi:. ISSN 0893-3952.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 Robert V Rouse. Papillary Urothelial (Transitional Cell) Carcinoma. Stanford University School of Medicine. Original posting/updates: 10/20/12, 12/29/12
- ↑ 0.3%-1%: Page 77 in:Beltran, Antonio (2017). Pathology of the prostate : an algorithmic approach . Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-18565-3. OCLC 1011514854.
- ↑ 0.5-2%: Kumar, Kishore; Ahmed, Rafeeq; Chukwunonso, Chime; Tariq, Hassan; Niazi, Masooma; Makker, Jasbir; Ihimoyan, Ariyo (2018). "Poorly Differentiated Small-Cell-Type Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Case Report and Literature Review ". Case Reports in Oncology 11 (3): 676–681. doi:. ISSN 1662-6575.
- ↑ Wang, Jue; Wang, Fen Wei; Hemstreet, George P. (2011). "Younger Age Is an Independent Predictor for Poor Survival in Patients with Signet Ring Prostate Carcinoma ". Prostate Cancer 2011: 1–8. doi:. ISSN 2090-3111.
- ↑ Ninomiya, Sahoko; Kawahara, Takashi; Iwashita, Hiromichi; Iwamoto, Genta; Takamoto, Daiji; Mochizuki, Taku; Kuroda, Shinnosuke; Takeshima, Teppei; et al. (2018). "Prostate Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report ". Case Reports in Oncology 11 (1): 138–142. doi:. ISSN 1662-6575.
- ↑ American Joint Committee on Cancer. Edge, Stephen B, ed. (2010). AJCC cancer staging manual. (7th ed.). New York: Springer. p. 457–468. ISBN 9780387884400.
- ↑ . TNM | UICC (in en). Union for International Cancer Control. Retrieved on 11 November 2017.
Image sources